The Physics Education Research group at the University of Colorado Boulder (PER@C) has developed and compiled a number of resources for research-based instruction throughout the undergraduate curriculum. This site includes materials developed by PER@C members as part of the Science Education Initiative and other research-based efforts, as well as materials developed by other faculty at CU Boulder.
On this site, you will find a number of materials we have borrowed or developed. Feel free to use what you like - we would like to share our materials, but also believe in giving credit to sources whenever possible (and ask that you do not use our materials for commercial purposes). We ask for your cooperation in not making any solutions you may create for the homework (and exam problems, clicker questions, etc…) available on the open web, out of respect for instructors and students at other institutions, and for maintaining the integrity of our research.
If you have questions, contributions, bug-catches, etc, please contact steven.pollock (at) colorado.edu Thanks!
Modern Physics is the third semester in our three-semester sequence of introductory physics courses. Materials include the following topics:
special relativity, photoelectric effect, spectra, lasers, Bohr and deBroglie models, Stern-Gerlach, entanglement and single-quanta experiments, matter waves and the Schrödinger equation, tunneling (α-decay, STM's), hydrogen atoms and molecular bonding, conductivity, semiconductors and BECs.
Materials were originally developed for a course for engineering majors, with a focus on applications, in 2005 and 2006 by Wieman, Perkins, and McKagan (McKagan et al. 2007). They were later adapted for a course for physics majors to include special relativity by Finkelstein, Bohn, and later Rogers, Schibli, and Dessau. Finkelstein and Baily made further research-based adaptations to include content on quantum interpretation (Baily and Finkelstein 2010). Later updates by Finkelstein added a unit on diversity.
On this page, you will find a number of materials we have borrowed or developed. Feel free to use what you like - we would like to share materials, but also believe in giving credit to sources whenever possible. We ask for your cooperation in not making any solutions you may create for the homework (and exam problems, clicker questions, etc…) available on the open web, out of respect for instructors and students at other institutions, and for maintaining the integrity of our research.
The first set of materials is older, from the Science Education Initiative team (including C. Wieman, K. Perkins, S. McKagan, N. Finkelstein, and many others). It includes materials from multiple instutions dating back to 2009, and includes some homework and exam materials, lecture notes and slides, and more.
The second set of materials is from a recent implementation of the course at CU Boulder by Noah Finkelstein.
Quantum Mechanics Conceptual Survey (QMCS) assesses conceptual material typically taught in modern physics. Topics include wave functions, probability, wave-particle duality, uncertainty principle, infinite square well, one-dimensional tunneling, energy levels. You can learn more and download the assessment from PhysPort using the link above.
The archived modern physics materials are available together as a package in the Materials tab. The course calendar below (for SP11 - with SR) is the simplest way to browse the most current materials - the Materials download (above) contains the files.
Written homework was assigned on Tuesdays, and due at the beginning of class on the Thursday in the following week (i.e., 10 days later). Students were expected to complete the readings before the lecture.
WEEK |
Tuesday Lecture | Thursday Lecture | Homework |
1 |
(No class) | 1. Introduction, math review |
HW 1 |
2 |
2. E&M review, waves & wave equations |
3. Interference, polarization, |
HW 2 |
3 |
4. Michelson-Morley experiment, SR postulates |
5. Time dilation, length contraction |
HW 3 |
4 |
6. Lorentz transformations, spacetime, addition of velocities |
7. Relativistic momentum, energy |
No HW |
5 |
8. Modeling in physics, intro to quantum |
Exam 1 |
HW 4 |
6 |
9. Photoelectric effect 1 |
10. Photoelectric effect 2, photons |
HW 5 |
7 |
11. Photons, atomic spectra |
12. Lasers |
HW 6 |
8 |
13. Bohr model, de Broglie waves |
14. Stern-Gerlach experiments |
HW 7 + |
9 |
15. Repeated spin measurements, probability |
16. Entanglement, EPR, quantum cryptography |
HW 8 + |
10 |
17. Single-photon experiments, complementarity |
18. Electron diffraction, matter waves, |
HW 9 + |
11 |
19. Matter waves, Review for Exam 2 |
Exam 2 |
No HW |
12 |
20. Wave equations, Schrodinger equation, |
21. Infinite/finite square well, tunneling |
HW 10 |
13 |
22. Tunneling, alpha-decay |
23. Radioactivity, STM's |
HW 11 |
14 |
24. Hydrogen atom 1 |
25. Hydrogen atom 2 |
HW 12 |
15 |
26. Multi-electron atoms, periodic table, |
Exam 3 |
No HW |
16 |
27. Molecular bonding, Bose-Einstein Condensates |
Review |
(Final Exam) |
The online simulations listed below were used in both lectures and homeworks for the Spring 2011 modern physics course at CSM. Most of these links lead directly to the PhET Interactive Simulations project, online simulations developed at the University of Colorado, many of them specifically for this course. There are a number of sims for all kinds of quantum phenomena that we didn't use, as well as general physics content. We would also recommend the simulations from the The Quantum Mechanics Visualisation Project at the University of St Andrews.
Note that some older sims are java or flash. (Your mileage may vary running those on modern browsers - if you want to use these in classes be aware that e.g. some will not work on phones or pads)
Weeks 1-2: (Pre-Quantum)
Special Relativity:
We're aware of only a few simulations for topics from special relativity [please let us know about ones you think are good]. The special relativity lecture slides (CSM SP11) are nicely animated, but not particularly interactive. We have not tested them with students, but there are some interesting visualizations at:
Week 6:
Week 7:
Week 8:
Week 10:
Week 13:
Week 14:
(This is an early draft from 2006)
Selected topical learning goals for Phys 2130
1. Wave function and probability
2. Wave-particle duality
3. Schrodinger Equation
4. Quantization of energy/quantum numbers/unique states
5.Uncertainty principle
6. Superposition
7. Operators and observables
8. Measurement
The papers linked below explain much of the process and rationale behind the transformations. The first part (2006) reports on the state of affairs following the first year of the process, after the course had been taught twice (in the FA05 and SP06 semesters). The second part (2011) details additional changes that were made to the materials as part of Charles Baily's dissertation project on quantum perspectives.
At CU Boulder, sophomore Classical Mechanics spans two semesters, explicitly adding coverage of a number of math tools that will be (re)encountered throughout the remainder of a typical physics major's career, introducing them in the context of Classical Mechanics.
Classical Mechanics/Math Methods 1 includes Newton's laws with velocity dependent forces, rockets, energy and gravity, and oscillations with damping and drivers. Classical Mechanics/Math Methods 2 continues with Lagrangian and Hamiltonian formalism, rigid body rotation, normal modes, orbits, non-inertial frames, linear algebra and matrix methods, and calculus of variations.
The Classical Mechanics 1 course was developed through the Science Education Initiative starting in 2009 with work from S. Pollock, S. Chasteen, R. Pepper, A. Marino, D. Caballero and many others.
The course was updated by S. Pollock and E. Neil with additional in-class tutorials and lecture notes in 2022. The Classical Mechanics 2 course was developed by several faculty at CU who shared their materials, especially E. Neil, and is not associated with any education research projects.
For details about either semester, click on the appropriate course link above.
E&M at CU is a two-semester sequence of junior-level classical electricity and magnetism.
Content coverage follows the textbook of Griffiths, Introduction to Electrodynamics)
E&M 1 covers electro- and magnetostatics, roughly Ch 1-6 of Griffiths.
E&M 2 covers electrodynamics, roughly Ch 7-12 of Griffiths.
For details about either semester, click on the appropriate course link above.
Reformed course materials were developed through the Science Education Initiative starting in 2007 with work from S. Pollock, S. Chasteen, M. Dubson, C. Baily, X. Ryan and many others.
Quantum Mechanics 1 is the first semester of our two-semester sequence of quantum mechanics.
This tab contains links to materials for a variety of (mostly) undergraduate courses offered at CU Boulder.
Materials in this page are not "research-validated", they did not arise from the Science Education Initiative. They are a collection of informal materials that might prove useful if you are teaching a student-centered large University-level course.
Use what you like - give credit to sources when feasible. We ask that you do not use our materials for commercial purposes. We also ask for your cooperation in not making any solutions you may create for the homework (and exam problems, clicker questions, etc…) available on the open web, out of respect for instructors and students at other institutions, and for maintaining the integrity of our research.
Our material sets include concept tests and lecture notes, and sometimes more (e.g. course goals, etc) Courses are identified by topic, with details in each tab.
We teach a variety of introductory courses at CU. The calculus-based sequence (Phys 1110, largely engineers) serves over 1000 students/semester, split into sections of 300 (3x 50 minutes/week), and recitations (1x 50 minutes of UW Tutorials) of 28 students. A very similar course for our majors serves (Phys 1115) about 125 students/year, same format.
The main Physics 1 download is from a recent implementation of the major's course.
Materials should still be useful for any calculus-based course (and with modification, an algebra-based course, as we don't require Calculus as a prerequisite, so we use minimal amounts of it)
These materials are research-informed but not research-validated. Primary contributors are S. Pollock, M. Dubson, and D. Bolton, with contributions from many others.
Physics 2 is Electricity and Magnetism.
We teach a variety of introductory E&M courses courses at CU. The calculus-based sequence (Phys 1120, largely for engineers) serves just under 1000 students/semester, split into sections of ~300 (3x 50 minutes/week), and recitations (1x 50 minutes of UW Tutorials) of 28 students. A very similar course (Phys 1125) for our majors serves about 125 students/year, same format.
We have an (old) collection of materials from an implementation in 2007, working on some updates.
Still coming - please check back (or contact steven.pollock (at) colorado.edu if you are in a hurry!)
These materials are research-informed but not research-validated. Primary contributors are S. Pollock, M. Dubson, and D. Bolton, with contributions from many others.
Materials from a graduate level course at CUB on Physics Education Research (cross-listed for advance undergraduates) Designed by Noah Finkelstein.
Still coming - please check back (or contact steven.pollock (at) colorado.edu if you are in a hurry!)
We teach an interactive large-lecture course called "Light and Color" to about 100 students/term, mostly non-science majors. The course is an introduction to the science of optics, with no prerequisites (and very light on math or formalism). It uses a variety of readings, including from a (free) OpenStax textbook (College Physics 2e).
Downloads below are from a recent implementation taught by B. Wilcox.
The materials are (largely) not research-validated, but were inspired in part by earlier course transformations at CU Boulder from 2010-2017 taught by Stephanie Chasteen, CharlesRogers, Katie Hinko, and Cindy Regal, with contributions from other instructors.
This course is a large introductory level class aimed at non-science majors. The materials shared here are not research-based in any way, just some materials from when S. Pollock taught the course in 2007.
We teach a senior-level thermodynamics and statistical mechanics course for physics majors, following the textbook "Introduction to Thermal Physics," by Daniel Schroeder.
Materials are not research-validated, merely shared by faculty at CU including Michael Dubson, M. Hermele, V. Gurarie, and most recently Bethany Wilcox (whose latest version is featured in the download) The course has interactive elements (clicker questions, and in-class Tutorials) developed by various faculty.
Classical Mechanics/Math Methods 1 is the first course in a two-semester classical mechanics sequence. Physics content coverage includes Newton's laws with velocity dependent forces, conservation of momentum and energy, gravity, and oscillations with damping and drivers. Math topics include polar coordinates and spherical unit vectors, methods for solving ODEs, complex numbers, multi-dimensional and line integration, divergence, gradient and curl, delta functions and Fourier series methods (in the context of driven harmonic oscillations) See "About the Course" below for more details.
The original Classical Mechanics 1 course was developed through the Science Education Initiative starting in 2009 with work from S. Chasteen, R. Pepper, S. Pollock, A. Marino, D. Caballero and many others. The course was updated by S. Pollock and E. Neil with additional in-class tutorials and lecture notes in 2022.
On this page, you will find a number of materials we have borrowed or developed. Feel free to use what you like - we would like to share materials, but also believe in giving credit to sources whenever possible. We ask for your cooperation in not making any solutions you may create for the homework (and exam problems, clicker questions, etc…) available on the open web, out of respect for instructors and students at other institutions, and for maintaining the integrity of our research
The first set of materials is older, from the Science Education Initiative team (including S. Pollock, A. Marino, R. Pepper, D. Caballero, and many others). It includes materials from CUB dating back to 2011 and includes some homework and exam materials, lecture notes and slides, and more.
The second set of materials is from a more recent implementation of the course at CU Boulder by Steven Pollock, Ethan Neil, and followed up by Michael Dubson.
Colorado Classical Mechanics/Math Methods Instrument (CCMI) assesses conceptual material which typically comes at the start of most Classical Mechanics courses, including key associated math skills. Topics include solutions to the most basic ODE’s in mechanics, interpreting energy contours, potential energy, SHM and damped or driven oscillations, polar coordinates and unit vectors, and more. There is also a short pre-test on a more limited set of questions. You can learn more and download the open-ended version (with scoring rubrics) from PhysPort using the link above.
Online multiple-response versions of both pre- and post-tests are under development, with a beta version implemented on Qualtrics. Contact Steven.Pollock (at) Colorado.edu if you would like to try this in your class.
The primary texts we used for this course are Taylor’s “Classical Mechanics,” (University Science Books, California, 2005) and Boas’s “Mathematical Methods in the Physical Sciences,” 3rd Edition (John Wiley & Sons, 2006).
The following additional texts may be helpful:
First Semester (2210):
Math | Physics Contexts |
---|---|
Vectors, curvilinear coordinate systems. Quick review of vector addition, dot and cross products. Spherical and cylindrical coordinate systems, simple derivatives. | Kinematics. Position, velocity, and acceleration. |
ODEs. Guess and check, linear ODEs, constant coefficient ODEs. | Newton's Laws. Reference frames, F=ma, 1D motion, 3D motion. |
Line integrals. Gradient operator. Taylor expansion. | Conservation Laws. Kinetic and potential energy, small oscillations, momentum and angular momentum. |
Complex numbers. ODEs. Fourier series. Fourier transforms(cover transforms quickly). | Simple harmonic oscillator. Damped and driven oscillators, resonance. |
Fourier series applications. PDEs. Separation of variables (in Cartesian and polar coordinates). | Heat equation. Poisson equation. |
Surface and volume integrals. Gauss' theorem. Legendre polynomials. Laplace equation. Selected Vector Calc. | Gravitation. |
Delta functions | Gravitation. |
There are many mathematical prerequisites for this course, and students have varying degrees of comfort with this material. (See Learning Goals for a more detailed lists of prerequisites). Faculty may give a mathematical pre-test to students to both (a) assess where students are under-prepared, and (b) send students the message that this is material they should already be familiar with. Students are expected to have seen complex numbers previously in Modern Physics, but are likely not proficient with manipulating them.
Our students often come into this course with unreasonable (low) expectations for the amount of work it will require. This course may be different from what they have encountered before in terms of the level of sophistication required from their involvement in the course and the amount of time that the homework will require. To that end, making course expectations explicit may be useful in order to prompt students to shoulder the responsibility for their own learning to a greater degree than they have in past courses. This can include giving explicit learning goals for the course and by framing the course appropriately from the beginning. (Examples can be found in the course materials download section above)
There is a general consensus among faculty that the bulk of the learning in this course comes from doing the homework. This course is where students learn a certain level of sophistication in solving problems (see Learning Goals) and so assigned homework should reflect that higher expectation. The STF (Rachel Pepper) has compiled a homework “bank” of useful problems to draw on using the approaches below.
Some ideas for homework sets:
There are a variety of lecture techniques that have been shown to be useful in student engagement.
Many of the more simple, conceptual homework problems can be reworked into clicker questions, serving two purposes: (a) students engage in meaningful discussion about the concept rather than seeking the answer, and (b) leaving more time for longer problems on the homework set. Faculty members, in conjunction with Science Teaching Fellows, have developed a bank of clicker questions. Clicker questions have proven very effective, though time consuming, in this course, generating a good deal of student discussion and highlighting student difficulties. In addition, because students’ knowledge is tested often, it is easier for them to know where their difficulties lie. One student remarked that the clicker questions in this class worked better than in other classes because they were integrated deeply into the lecture – they acted to connect one topic to the next, instead of a 5-minute aside. T hey were a bridge rather than a break in lecture.
Are you having trouble with the formatting in our clicker question files? Sometimes your “slide master” may have different settings than the “master” when the slides were created, which causes formatting difficulties (like questions that are too small to read, or answers that spill off the page). See the “readme” file in the “All-concept-tests” folder in the folder “D-Materials-By-Collection”.
When solving a problem on the board, the lecturer can pause and ask the class for the next step. If the course culture has included the use of clicker questions, so that students are habituated to actually engaging with this sort of question (instead of waiting for the smartest student to answer), then this type of discussion can occur without the use of actual clickers in every instance. The class should be given a time limit (e.g., “You have 30 seconds, write down your answer”) to focus their discussion. We find that students are more likely to actually write something down on paper if the lecturer leaves the front of the room and talks briefly to students in the middle of the room.
In addition to clicker questions, faculty can pose open-ended questions (non multiple choice) for discussion in class, providing students an opportunity to engage with the concepts in class. The more that instructors are clearly open to discussion in class, the more students will feel comfortable posing spontaneous questions.
Tutorials are conceptually focused worksheet activities designed to be done in small groups during class time. They last between 10 and 50 minutes. Many of these have been adopted or adapted from the Intermediate Mechanics Tutorials. The tutorials are written up separately, as is a Tutorial User’s Guide.
Students can read the chapter as they work on the problem set. It may be useful to encourage students to read the chapter before lecture, if the professor does not intend to reiterate material from the book in lecture. In that case, lecture may be spent in productive discussion and engagement with the material. Students can easily read derivations and similar content in the book, and so professors may decide how much of that content should be included in lecture.
We have adapted a handful of kinesthetic activities from Oregon State University – for example, asking students to point in the direction of \(\hat{r}\) or \(\hat{\theta}\) given that one corner of the room is origin. As a method of engaging students and maintaining their attention, it has been very valuable.
While recitations can’t be mandatory for this 3-credit course, it is useful to offer an instructor- or TA-led session to work on issues in the homework. In the reformed course, we encouraged students to work in small groups on the homework. They learn by peer instruction with occasional input from the instructor, as in the tutorials. Each group may have a group-sized whiteboard (see above), and the TA does not work out problems on the board, as has been traditionally the case. We have offered two homework help sessions – two nights and one night before the homework is due.
These learning goals for classical mechanics were created by a group of physics faculty from a number of research areas, including physics education research. Rather than addressing specific content to be covered in a course (as with a syllabus), this list of course-scale learning goals represents what we think students should be able to do at this stage of their development as physicists. The list of topic-specific learning goals reflects the knowledge and skills that were emphasized in the transformed Class Mech 1 courses at CU Boulder.
This page presents an organized "dump" of observed student difficulties with material presented in the course. (See next section for some references)
(** means we have found it is prevalent/serious among our students)
The course was under study by Danny Caballero, a Science Teaching Fellow at CU Boulder, and now Professor at Michigan State University. Previously, Rachel Pepper, now at the University of Puget Sound, began developing materials and instituting research efforts into student challenges. Research efforts were funded by the University of Colorado's Science Education Initiative.
Student difficulties with course material - We are investigating which topics, concepts, and methods are challenging for students to learn and why. The first of these topics we have investigated is students' use of mathematics in this course. In particular, how and when students use Taylor approximations. We have written a short paper describing a framework developed to scaffold students' difficulties. This work resulted in a longer paper that describes the framework and it's use in multiple contexts. More recently, we have begun looking at theoretical constructs that help explain how students use math in these courses.
Assessment of transformed and traditional Classical Mechanics courses - We are developing an assessment for use in middle-division Classical Mechanics. We have papers detailing the design and use of the instrument, as well as a more detailed article on the grading of the instrument.
Teaching students to use numerical computation - We have begun to embed numerical computation into this course. This is active topic of research for us. We have written a paper describing our experiences teaching students with this embedded pedagogy.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. Works borrowed or adapted from others are subject to their respective licenses.
This material is based upon work supported by the University of Colorado, The Hewlett Foundation, and the National Science Foundation under Grant Numbers DUE 1023028, DUE 0737118, PHY 0748742, and CAREER 0448176. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.