What is “backwards design” and how can I use it in my physics classes?

posted October 11, 2024
by Stephanie Chasteen (University of Colorado Boulder) and Lauren Bauman (PhysPort)

Backwards design is a method for course planning where the instructor starts from the “end goal” or “learning objectives”---what they want their students to know—and then works backwards, designing assessment activities and learning activities that are aligned with the end goal, rather than looking for a classroom activity that seems engaging and related to course content and then creating an assessment that relates to that activity. Using backwards design helps ensure that your instruction and assessments are aligned with your intended outcomes (as shown in the figure below) and that they are supporting students in achieving those goals. Although it is possible to align instruction retroactively, assigning outcomes (or implicitly choosing outcomes) based instruction and assessment, backwards design helps you stay focused on creating a cohesive course that is driven by learning outcomes you’ve thought about carefully.

This Expert Recommendation will outline the three steps of backwards design using an example from a physics class.

  1. Defining learning objectives (desired student learning outcomes or goals)
  2. Deciding on assessments (evidence of understanding)
  3. Designing instruction (helping students achieve results) 

Image adapted from Fink 2013.

1. Defining learning objectives: What are your desired student learning outcomes (SLOs)

Student learning outcomes (SLOs) are:

  • Used to describe learning in a class, topic, module, or course.
  • A statement of what students should be able to do as a result of learning about a topic.

Examples:

  1. Students should be able to project a given vector into components in multiple coordinate systems.
  2. Students should be able to translate a physical description of an upper-division electromagnetism problem to a mathematical equation necessary to solve it.
  3. Students should be able to predict changes in voltage across different elements in an RC circuit both when it is charging and when it is discharging.

Student learning outcomes should be specific and measurable. The table below provides some examples of specific, measurable verbs for SLOs.

Lower-order learning Higher-order learning Non-content learning
  • Define
  • List
  • Match
  • Recognize
  • State
  • Label
  • Describe
  • Discuss
  • Paraphrase
  • Explain
  • Identify
  • Locate
  • Select
  • Solve
  • Use
  • Show
  • Organize
  • Demonstrate
  • Interpret
  • Sketch (simple)
  • Differentiate
  • Organize
  • Relate
  • Compare
  • Contrast
  • Distinguish
  • Examine
  • Experiment
  • Test
  • Argue
  • Defend
  • Judge
  • Critique
  • Design
  • Conjecture
  • Develop
  • Formulate
  • Investigate
  • Sketch (complex/process)
 
  • Come to see themselves as…
  • Decide to become…
  • Interact with others around…
  • Get excited about…
  • Be more interested in…
  • Value…
  • Be able to construct knowledge about…
  • Frame useful questions…
  • Be able to (read/study/find information) effectively…

Once you have some SLOs, you can use this checklist to ensure they are clear, specific, and measurable: 

  • Does the SLO identify what a student should be able to do or say as a result of learning (and not just identify the topic they should learn)?
  • Is it clear how you might test whether students achieved the SLO?
  • Do the verbs have a clear meaning? (e.g., avoid the use of the words “understand” or “know”)
  • Is the SLO aligned with the level of cognitive understanding expected of students? (i.e., higher- or lower-level understanding)
  • Do the SLOs cover the range of types of desired learning (e.g., facts, concepts, processes, skills, big ideas, metacognition, beliefs)?
  • Is the SLO written using language and terminology that is student-friendly? 
  • Is it possible to write the SLO so it is relevant and useful to students?

Non-content learning outcomes adapted from Fink's “human dimension,” “caring” and “learning how to learn” dimensions of learning outcomes; see Fink 2013.

For a detailed overview on developing student learning outcomes with many examples for specific physics courses, see the Expert Recommendation “How do I develop student learning outcomes for physics courses?

2. Deciding on assessments: what assessments will provide students feedback and/or serve as evidence of understanding

Next, think about what assessments will show evidence of students meeting the specific SLO. Consider both how students will gauge their own learning and how instructors will gauge student learning. For example, for the SLO: “Students should be able to predict changes in voltage across different elements in an RC circuit both when it is charging and when it is discharging,” an assessment task/question could be:

The circuit above contains two resistors (R1 and R2), a capacitor, an ideal battery, and a switch. The potential difference across the battery’s terminals is 𝛥V0. On the blank graph (right), sketch a graph of the voltage across R1 and the voltage across R2 as a function of time, from the instant the switch is closed until a long time later.

This question directly relates to the SLO, assessing if students can predict the change in voltage across components in an RC circuit when it is charging and discharging.

3. Designing Instruction: what will help students achieve results?

Finally, think about what activities will help students succeed on the assessment and achieve the learning goals. When thinking about instruction, consider what will students do to achieve the SLOs? What is a rough schedule of events? What will happen inside the class vs outside the class? What instructional resources can I draw on? Going back to our example from RC circuits, the lesson design or activity may be:

Class begins with think-pair-share with voting questions asking about an RC circuit that has a single resistor, a single capacitor, a single battery, and a switch in connected series. The questions ask students to determine the charge held by the capacitor, the current through the capacitor, and the voltage across the capacitor both when the switch closes (t = 0) and a long time afterwards (t = ∞). Next, students engage in a matching activity where they have to find the graph that best represents (i.e., has the qualitatively correct shape) the above quantities (charge, current, and voltage) as functions of time (for both charging and discharging). This is followed by a mini-lecture showing the mathematical expressions for these quantities and how they come from applying Kirchoff’s loop rule.

This lesson relates directly to the SLO and scaffolds learning towards supporting students in mastering the content that prepares them for the assessment question.

Another example of backwards design from astronomy

Lesson topic: Detection of Exoplanets Doppler Method

Student learning outcomes:

  • Students will be able to connect how variables (star mass, planet masses, and orbital distance) in the doppler shift magnitude equation are related to corresponding features of the different orbital drawings and V vs T graphs.
  • Students will be able to interpret V vs T graphs and orbital drawings to determine system properties.
  • Students will be able to sketch a V vs T graph and orbital drawing given initial conditions of the system.

Assessment Questions/Tasks:

Formative: Think-pair-share questions on (1) which exoplanets would be easiest to detect, (2) ranking graphs in terms of greatest doppler shift, and (3) identifying planet position from V vs T graph.

Summative: Student white board drawing of V vs T graph and orbital diagram for planet position between zero doppler and max blueshift. Quiz Questions asking students to (1) identify variables that affect doppler shift in system, (2) match V vs T graph and Orbital diagram, and (3) determine time on V vs T graph given location identified on orbit diagram.

 Lesson Design and Activities

15 minute interactive lecture to motivate interest in study of exoplanets; help with connecting and identifying critical ideas associated Two body orbital system, and mathematical expression relating Doppler shift to star mass, planet mass and distance; and unpack critical ideas and associations relating V vs T graph to orbital drawings.

Use 3-5 think-pair-share questions during lecture and after Lecture-Tutorial activity

20 minutes on Lecture Tutorial activity

10 minutes on White board activity

You can download this backwards design lesson plan template as a docx or pdf

References